S.C
This new claimant taken out disabled widow’s insurance coverage professionals into worker’s income listing, however the Assistant rejected their own software given that claimant didn’t meet up with the nine-week cycle-of-matrimony requirements inside 42 You. 416(c). So it denial try upheld because of the section legal. The fresh claimant following appealed for the U.S. Courtroom regarding Is attractive towards Earliest Routine. The legal away from appeals indexed one Puerto Rico will not accept common-rules marriages hence the requirements having setting up a valid kissbrides.com visite esta pГЎgina matrimony inside Puerto Rico are prepared onward from inside the Article 69 of Municipal Password, 30 L.P.R.An excellent. § 231. This new courtroom discovered that, in this instance, the needs of Article 69 was indeed clearly not found nine days prior to the worker’s passing. This new judge subsequent unearthed that the fresh claimant’s constitutional “equal protection” assault to the 9-month stage-of-relationships needs was invalid less than Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749, 95 S.Ct. 2457, forty-five L.Ed.2d 522 (1975), and you will Mathews v. de- Castro, 429 U.S. 181, 97 S.Ct. 431, fifty L.Ed.2d 389 (1976). The newest claimant including contended that, as she was the fresh new worker’s concubine, she got the right significantly less than Puerto Rican law in order to inherit from the fresh worker’s property given that their widow, and you will she can be deemed to be new widow of staff around 42 U. 416(h)(1)(A). New legal off appeals unearthed that, around Puerto Rican legislation, an excellent concubine out of an employee possess a straight to a portion of the home acquired throughout concubinage but does not have a straight to inherit an effective widow’s express of the lifeless worker’s intestate individual assets. Thus, the claimant couldn’t become considered to be the new widow from the brand new staff less than 42 U. 416(h)(1)(A) of the application of what the law states regarding Puerto Rico into the intestate succession. In the upholding brand new region court’s choice affirming the fresh Secretary’s assertion regarding which allege having widow’s gurus, the fresh courtroom regarding is attractive kept that claimant wasn’t entitled to help you experts because handicapped widow of staff member.
She contended one, while the she and worker got cohabited to own twenty years previous to your date of the ceremonial relationships, the cohabitation got turned their matchmaking towards a legal matrimony really before 9-week several months
Appellant Esther Ayuso Morales needed Personal Safeguards impairment gurus based upon their own updates given that “widow” of your covered worker Honorio Montanez Figueroa. Less than 42 You. § 416(c) to be considered because the an excellent “widow” a lady need started hitched for around 9 weeks during their own partner’s demise. Appellant’s relationships occurred within the 9-day several months. Gurus was basically declined.
Towards attention, she urges you to she is nonetheless qualified because the she cohabited having her husband for two decades prior to its relationship. She contributes you to, in any event, under 42 U. § 416(h)(1)(A) a candidate is actually a good widow in the event the she’d, “within the legislation . . . [regarding Puerto Rico] determining the fresh devolution of intestate individual property, have a similar reputation . . . as the a partner . . . [or] widow. . . .” Come across fundamentally, Rombauer, Relationship Status and Qualifications to own Federal Statutory Earnings Gurus: A historical Survey, 52 Clean.L.Rev. 227, 257 ainsi que. seq. (1977). She says that concubinage legislation out-of Puerto Rico provides their unique for example updates.
We cannot undertake appellant’s very first conflict. We all know that some common law jurisdictions accept low-ceremonial or “common-law marriages.” These marriage ceremonies are manufactured from the consent of events since the another deal. F.W. Kuchlar, Laws out of Involvement and you can Relationships 1-5 (2d ed. 1978); pick O.Age. Koegel, Common-law ent in the united states (1922). However, common-law marriages aren’t recognized within the Puerto Rico. The fresh requisites from a valid marriage in the Puerto Rico are ready forth during the Blog post 69 of one’s Municipal Password, 31 L.P.R.An effective. § 231. Provided of those requisites ‘s the “[a]uthorization and you may occasion regarding a beneficial matrimonial deal with respect to the versions and solemnities recommended for legal reasons.” In the lack of these versions and you can solemnities, there is certainly no matrimony. Rivera v. District Courtroom out of San Juan, 58 P.Roentgen.Roentgen. 352, 354 (1941); Vazquez Bote, Notas sobre este matrimonio durante derecho puertoriqueno, 49-56 Rev. P.Roentgen. 491, 493-94, 510-a dozen (1973-75). Age. Lalaguana Dominguez, Estudios de derecho matrimonial 244-forty-five (1962).